The first big victim of the Union Bailout Scam has been hit. Dayton Ohio will close it's GM plant, forever changing the landscape of a once thriving city. Many of the city's financial infrastructures are dependent on GM's business needs.
The image I have going in my head is of three men in suits, armed with assault rifles and wearing ski masks standing above about a dozen people kneeling and blindfolded. One of them is on the floor bleeding; he has been shot in the head. As the other hostages quake with fear one of the men in suits yells in a burly voice, "Alright, listen up! We demand 25 Billion dollars in unmarked bills or else the rest of these dopes are gonna take a dirt nap."
As some have mentioned, this entire bailout business is nothing more than the biggest heist in history. The cost to us, the tax payer, will be in the trillions and least for generations to come. What is peculiar about this is that this plant is the only one owned by GM that is not under control of the United Auto Workers. This stinks something rotten. So with this move, the UAW becomes the only union in charge of GM production and sends a message to Washington at the same time.
Meanwhile, the auto manufacturers not controlled by unions are not in such dire straits as the big three. Do you see the connection here? The unions are pulling the strings. These crooks are holding our economy hostage for billions of dollars. These same crooks openly endorsed Barack Obama for the presidency. The crooks of Wall Street also have deep connections to Obama. Franklin Raines and Jim Johnson were both CEOs of Fannie Mae and were key political and economic advisors during his presidential campaign.
The thing that is the funniest about this whole deal is that since most of the country, about ¾ of this country, are unhappy with the Bush administration, blame will forever be passable to his administration, even as they rob us blind. They will use this manufactured crisis to grow government and increase taxes. Yeah, this is "change" alright, from one set of crooks to another. Except these guys are bigger and claim to be champions of the "little guy".
Get ready America, it's going to be a bumpy ride.
Wednesday, November 19, 2008
Friday, November 14, 2008
Anyone Else Getting This? Why Are We Being Coached By Democrats?
The very idea seems absurd to me. It would be as if we went to WWII and asked the Germans how the Allies could hope to win more battles. You think they are going to be honest? Even worse, they have on Democrat columnists and Loser Republicans. Republicans who say that we should move to the so called center. It didn't work out so well for them did it? Leave it to CCCPNN, Faux News and MSBDSM (OK, I'm having too much fun here) to say that the Republican party is not enough like the Democrat party.
They attribute this fact as our downfall when it really couldn't be further from the truth. The nation is sick of Center-Left policies, it's just that those policies have been implemented, to our shame, by the GOP. Bush increased spending and government interference, something you would expect a Democrat to do. So it is no wonder that we elected Barack Obama. He labeled the liberal policies of George Bush as Conservative and told America that it was time for "Change" by moving even further to the left. The people swallowed this tripe in large part because the GOP failed to educate them.
Obama didn't win this election, we lost it and handed this socialist our nation on a silver platter.
They attribute this fact as our downfall when it really couldn't be further from the truth. The nation is sick of Center-Left policies, it's just that those policies have been implemented, to our shame, by the GOP. Bush increased spending and government interference, something you would expect a Democrat to do. So it is no wonder that we elected Barack Obama. He labeled the liberal policies of George Bush as Conservative and told America that it was time for "Change" by moving even further to the left. The people swallowed this tripe in large part because the GOP failed to educate them.
Obama didn't win this election, we lost it and handed this socialist our nation on a silver platter.
Monday, November 10, 2008
Move more to the center? I don't think so.
There is a war of ideals going on today. The fighting is within the Republican party and it is ferocious to say the least. On one side, there are the centrist blue blood country club republicans and on the other side are the social and fiscal conservatives.
I was just listening to Lou Dobbs and he had on a man who is pushing for the GOP to become more centrist. He was a former staff member of Rudy Giuliani, unfortunately I didn't remember his name. It was really funny to listen to really. Rush Limbaugh had mentioned that the media would make it a habit of bring on analysis of people who lost and ask them how their party can win. So in this case, it was the loser (Giuliani) who lost to the loser (McLame) telling us that conservatism doesn't work and that it can't win.
He went on to say that Social conservatives are a dying breed. He pulled some numbers out of his ass that McCain only won voters over 65 and voters in towns no larger than 50,000 in size. That may be true, but it doesn't mean that social conservatives are scarce, it just means that many social conservatives did not vote, or voted for Obama out of spite.
If it is true that Social conservatism is dying, then explain to me how in the biggest liberal state in the country, Proposition 8 (the vote to ban gay marriage) won the ballot. We won 52% against 48% and of those 48%, many may include people who still think homosexuality is wrong, but voted against it on more libertarian reasons of non intrusion. Heck even Obama himself, mister radical left wing has stated his opposition to homosexuality, even if they choose to vote in favor for non intrusion reason.
So don't try to tell me social conservatism is dead. This is a concentrated attack by the country club republicans to team up with the left wing media and destroy the traditionalist conservative movement. Our only response is to clear them out.
I was just listening to Lou Dobbs and he had on a man who is pushing for the GOP to become more centrist. He was a former staff member of Rudy Giuliani, unfortunately I didn't remember his name. It was really funny to listen to really. Rush Limbaugh had mentioned that the media would make it a habit of bring on analysis of people who lost and ask them how their party can win. So in this case, it was the loser (Giuliani) who lost to the loser (McLame) telling us that conservatism doesn't work and that it can't win.
He went on to say that Social conservatives are a dying breed. He pulled some numbers out of his ass that McCain only won voters over 65 and voters in towns no larger than 50,000 in size. That may be true, but it doesn't mean that social conservatives are scarce, it just means that many social conservatives did not vote, or voted for Obama out of spite.
If it is true that Social conservatism is dying, then explain to me how in the biggest liberal state in the country, Proposition 8 (the vote to ban gay marriage) won the ballot. We won 52% against 48% and of those 48%, many may include people who still think homosexuality is wrong, but voted against it on more libertarian reasons of non intrusion. Heck even Obama himself, mister radical left wing has stated his opposition to homosexuality, even if they choose to vote in favor for non intrusion reason.
So don't try to tell me social conservatism is dead. This is a concentrated attack by the country club republicans to team up with the left wing media and destroy the traditionalist conservative movement. Our only response is to clear them out.
Sunday, November 9, 2008
Germany marks pogrom that led to Holocaust
Original Story
"Germans and Israelis on Sunday marked the 70th anniversary of Kristallnacht, the Nazi-incited riots that began their campaign to destroy European Jewry, with ceremonies, concerts and vows to honor the victims with renewed vigilance."
Learning from history is something everyone should do. Certainly this event in history should be looked upon with the utmost scrutiny and caution. The following segment, however did raise a small alarm for me.
"Chancellor Angela Merkel recalled the Nov. 9, 1938 riots in which more than 91 German Jews were killed and more than 1,000 synagogues damaged, telling Germans that the lessons of the nation's past were crucial in confronting a current increase of xenophobia and racism."
She is of course referring t0 the obscene amount of foreign refugees being imported into Europe. Most of them Muslims. As Muslims riot for the inclusion of Sharia Law to be placed into existing European Law, many Europeans cannot help but feel that without assimilation, the growing immigrant population will eventually overtake Europe and force them all under Islamic rule.
Angela Merkel's comments concern me because the two events have little in common. The Jews were not fresh groups of immigrants, many had been in Germany and Europe for decades, if not hundreds of years. Many were proud Germans in fact. In addition to that, the false notion of racial superiority has nothing to do with the factual notion of cultural superiority. Superiority not being a racial or religious based philosophy, but one derived from the ideals of liberty and justice no matter your race, gender or creed. Those who hail themselves as Muslim and believe in religious freedom without reprisal is not thinking that way from a religious perspective, but from a perspective derived from the governing culture of western civilization. A Muslim who thinks otherwise is of a non-assimilated mindset and will seek to overthrow liberty and replace it with theocratic dictatorships.
In that way, the two situations are different. So while I agree that we should not be trying to set a blame on a people or group, as the Nazis did, we should also not overlook the differences in the two situations.
"Germans and Israelis on Sunday marked the 70th anniversary of Kristallnacht, the Nazi-incited riots that began their campaign to destroy European Jewry, with ceremonies, concerts and vows to honor the victims with renewed vigilance."
Learning from history is something everyone should do. Certainly this event in history should be looked upon with the utmost scrutiny and caution. The following segment, however did raise a small alarm for me.
"Chancellor Angela Merkel recalled the Nov. 9, 1938 riots in which more than 91 German Jews were killed and more than 1,000 synagogues damaged, telling Germans that the lessons of the nation's past were crucial in confronting a current increase of xenophobia and racism."
She is of course referring t0 the obscene amount of foreign refugees being imported into Europe. Most of them Muslims. As Muslims riot for the inclusion of Sharia Law to be placed into existing European Law, many Europeans cannot help but feel that without assimilation, the growing immigrant population will eventually overtake Europe and force them all under Islamic rule.
Angela Merkel's comments concern me because the two events have little in common. The Jews were not fresh groups of immigrants, many had been in Germany and Europe for decades, if not hundreds of years. Many were proud Germans in fact. In addition to that, the false notion of racial superiority has nothing to do with the factual notion of cultural superiority. Superiority not being a racial or religious based philosophy, but one derived from the ideals of liberty and justice no matter your race, gender or creed. Those who hail themselves as Muslim and believe in religious freedom without reprisal is not thinking that way from a religious perspective, but from a perspective derived from the governing culture of western civilization. A Muslim who thinks otherwise is of a non-assimilated mindset and will seek to overthrow liberty and replace it with theocratic dictatorships.
In that way, the two situations are different. So while I agree that we should not be trying to set a blame on a people or group, as the Nazis did, we should also not overlook the differences in the two situations.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)